In the world's biggest criminal lawsuit - the Lockerbie Trial - the special Scottish Court in the Netherlands is working on false premises; says the well-known explosive expert Professor Dr. Hitmar Schubert from the Fraunhofer Institue of Technology and Science in Germany. His assumption originates to the alleged position of the explosive device aboard Pan Am flight 103.
Even our own experts that are collaborating with MEBO declare: " Those bizarre metal fragments that became teared loose from the skin of the fuselage on position No. 700, can only derive from explosive substance positioned in the immediate vicinty of the fuselage ! "
(See: evidence photo from the offical AAIB report 2/90, figure B-15, detail of shatter zone of fuselage)
Had the explosion occurred - as claimed by the AAIB-report - inside the container AVE 4041 PA with a distance from center of explosion to the shatter zone given as 25" (63.5 cm), such atypical fragments would never have occurred. Further, such bizarre fragments would never have occurred in the event of any explosion inside the container, as the schock wave would have been quelled by the Toshiba radio recorder, the fibre glass wall of the alleged Samsonite suitcase, the metal wall of the container itself and the fibreglass seperator panels. Thus, no explosion could have taken place inside the luggage container !
Feel free to acquaint yourself with the facts from these publications issued by MEBO:
- Report: " No Explosion Inside Container AVE 4041 PA "
- Document from MEBO sent to the Lord Advocate Colin Boyd July 14, 2000
- Report of Professor Dr. Hitmar Schubert from the Fraunhofer Institute of Technology and Science
- Evidental photo from the AAIB-report
Please be of our assistance and send us Your short comments/confirmations. In anticipation of Your support it will be possible to put pressure on the defence team in order to nourish further investigations in the important Lockerbie Case !
Both accused Libyan citizens, Fhima and Megrahi, as well as the relatives of the victims in this case, have a right to know the truth ! Why does the prosecution as well as the defence not commit themselves to this fact ?
We thank You.
Edwin Bollier VR