Switzerland, December 24, 2008
After that 20th anniversary of the Lockerbie tragedy
How will the world be responsive to the largest miscarriage of justice in Scotland in the "Lockerbie Case", if the manipulated proofs discovered by MEBO must be confirmed at the end of Megrahis current appeal?
In 2005 Edwin Bollier presented to the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) his own investigation thesis with determining facts, which among other things show clearly that no bomb suit-case was transported from air Malta via Frankfurt to London Heathrow and no MST-13 timer made for Libya was involved! At the 28th of June 2007 the SCCRC granted Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi a second appeal because of a possible miscarriage of justice.
Assistance call for the the Arab League and all technically and scientifically trained attorneys in favour of Muslim victim of Justice, Mr. Abdelbasset Al Megrahi:
This is a cry for help and an appeal to all lawyers to engage in helping to uncover the largest miscarriage of justice in the Scottish history.
The political hostage and "Lockerbie victim 271", Mr Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi, is suffering since April 6th, 1999 until now => 332,075,805 painful seconds innocent in Scottish prisons...
Petition for Mr. Al Megrahi to the Scottish Ministers
The SCCRC is in possession of all the indication material listed at the bottom of this document. What is preventing the Scottish Justice since 9 years to clear up the miscarriage of Justice against Libya and Mr. Abdelbasset Al Megrahi?
Because of a careless investigation and manipulated evidence Mr Megrahi was sentenced to 27 years in prison on January 31, 2001 by a panel of three Scottish judges for murder of 270 people.
Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd. Switzerland, expose today the true facts:
The Crown's jugdgement was based on manipulated circumstantial evidence saying that Mr. Megrahi had smuggled in a "Bomb-Bag" on Air Malta, flight KM-180. This was a deliberate wrong assumption by the Scottish Justice with the known fatal consequences for the Libyan Official Mr. Abdelbaset Ali Mohamed Al Megrahi and Libya ...
The alleged "BOMB-BAG" on AirMalta was a PHANTOM!
See below MEBO's proofs, free of doubts, for specialists:
Fatal consequences for Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi because of a Phantom Bomb-Bag from Malta!
Trial Day 38, July 21, 2000, Kamp van Zeist:
Mr. Gunther Kasteleiner was a traffic assistant at the baggage handling central station FAG in Frankfurt. As witness no. 799 at the trial in Kamp van Zeist he gave a wrong testimony about the 25 transfer baggages on flight PA-103/A. The question from Q was, how many items inter-line baggage are recorded?--
Kasteleiner, sworn (original): A- Yes. That's 25 different pieces of inter-line baggages. Q: And were some of those items coded in at hall middle? A: Yes.- Q: And were others coded in V3?- A Yes.
MEBO, correct is: 13 pieces of inter-line baggage and 12 pieces of on-line baggage (wrongly coded as inter-line) were transferred over the conveyance system in Frankfurt.
Important: The alleged "Bomb bag" B-8849 was not from AirMalta, it was a normal on-line bag from Berlin, wrongly coded as inter-line bag:
Tray B-8849 came from Berlin with flight PA-643 and belonged to passenger no. 131, Misses W. Wagenführ; coded in Frankfurt via counter V3-206, code S-0009+Z1307); (Prod. 1089, PTM-telex from PanAm company, after offbloc PA-643, 11:26 hour in Berlin, text: from flight PA-643 >> to PA 103B/21-LHRO/0/1/ B1 > (1 passenger+1 bag > B1) police reference DW 125;
Important, as example:
A luggage item from AirMalta would have been transferred inter-line on PA-103/A! PanAm PA-643 to PanAm PA-103/A is a on-line transfer.
Because of the wrong statement from Gunther Kasteleiner (all 25 bags transfered as inter-line) the court accepted erroneously that the suitcase (Tray B-8849) came from AirMalta, KM-180...
Thus witness Gunther Kasteleiner, traffic assistant FAG, is responsible for this fatal error, inter-line, instead of correctly on-line. Because of this error the bag B-8849 was assigned to AirMalta flight KM-180 !!!
Jointly responsible for this fatal error is a second Crown witness (no. 835), Klaus Wunderlich (FAG), who supported the wrong statement of the accusation:
"PanAm operated regular shuttle flights from Berlin to Frankfurt. Rather than send the baggage from these flights through the baggage conveyance system, if was standard practice to transport the baggage from the Berlin flight for PA-103/A directly in a trolley across the tarmac. If the loading of PA-103/A had not yet started, the trolley would be left in the baggage hall at the gate until the aircraft was ready for loading."
"The baggage did not go through the baggage conveyance system, the bags which were transferred to PA-103/A in this way are not included on the KIK computer print out."(See: Crown prod. 1060).
However according to the passenger transfer messages (PTM) from the Berlin shuttles on December 21, 1988" (Crown Prod. 1089) as stated by Klaus Wunderlich:
1. *One piece of baggage was transferred from PA-643 (which arrived at *13:05) onto PA-103/A.
(MEBO: This time was wrong, correct is: *13:02 on-bloc!)
2. Twenty one pieces of baggage were transferred from PA-647 (which arrived at 15:05) onto PA-103/A.
3. Four pieces of baggage were transferred from PA-649 (which arrived at 16:05) onto PA-103/A.
Important note from MEBO:
Passenger 131, Mrs W. Wagenführ was not summoned as a witness in Kamp van Zeist. She confirmed to MEBO in an interview that her flight PA-643 was already parked on gate 41, on December 21, 1988, around *12:30.
FACT: Prod. 1089, PTM-telex from PanAm company, conveyed after off-bloc PA-643, 11:26 hour in Berlin, text: from flight PA-643 >> to PA 103B/21-LHRO/0/1/B1 > (1 passenger+1 bag > B1) police reference DW 125. The flying time Berlin Frankfurt was approx 50 minutes, arrival FRA on-bloc 12:30 hour probably. The alleged arrival of PA-643, on-bloc 13:02 hour is wrong. The document, Gepäck-Anlieferung FA 32 (No. 0000158) was manipulated!
+++
Flight PA-124 came from Vienna und was parked in Frankfurt, at position 44, at 15:49, on-bloc. The flight number of this plane was altered at 16:15 to the new flight number: PA-103/A.
MEBO criticism:
Why the explanation of witness no. 835, Klaus Wunderlich, concerning the "standard practice", was not applicable in this case (PA-103/A):
Wunderlich's testimony: "If the loading of PA-103 had not yet commenced, the trolly would be left in the baggage hall at the gate until the aircraft was ready for loading. Because the baggage did not go through the baggage conveyancing system, the bags which were transfered to PA-103/A."
MEBO explanatory statement:
> Because the airplane of flight PA-103/A was only at 15:49 on-bloc on position 44, the on-line Bag from passenger Mrs. W. Wagenführ (Tray B-8849) was not loaded directly from flight PA-643 onto PA-103/A.
> Her baggage was also not stored in storage-room 44 because the Storeroom for Gate 44 (BO 44) was already occupied from 12:45 until 15:09 by the baggage of flight OA-1711.
The (1) piece on-line baggage from passanger No. 131, W. Wagenführ from Berlin (flight PA-643) was checked on PA-103/A ordinarily via the Conveyance System and according to the rules.
> Feeder flight PA-643 was at 13:02 on-bloc on position Gate No. 41. Because according to the rules on-line baggage is the first Transit-baggage to be unloaded, enough time was available (5 minutes) to bring the on-line baggage of passanger 131, W. Wagenführ, from Gate 41 to the Interline counter 206,V-3.
> With tray B-8849 the on-line Bag, (wrongly coded as inter-line: S-0009+Z1307) was placed at 13:07 Uhr in the FRA home-storage HS33; from there it was moved at 15:17 without X-ray-Control to storage-room BO 44. (See: HS33+Z1517--BO44+Z1523). From there it was loaded on PA-103/A.
(Notabene: For on-line baggage X-ray checks were only done at the first Check-In, in this case at Berlin-Tegel.
> AT 16:53, flight PA-103/A was off-block with destination LHR-JFK-DTW. Passanger no. 131, W. Wagenführ + 1 bag, Tray B-8849 were checked out at London-Heathrow (LHR). Therfore it is guaranteed that bag B-8849 was not transferred on the mainflight PA-103 to New York!
Supplement: The surveyed Facts
Important confirmation, from ex witness No. 817, July 25, 2000, Roland O' Neil, sworn, at the court, Kamp van Zeist. Excerpt, examination by Mr. Turnbull:
Q- Are you Roland O'Neil?
A- Yes.----
Q- And were you in fact the loadmaster for the Pan Am 103 Frankfurt-to- London flight?
A- Yes, I was. ---
Re-examination:
Q- Mr. O'Neil, if bags brought to Frankfurt onboard one Pan Am flight were due to be transferred to another, (on-line is meant, MEBO) somtimes they would be transferred across the tarmac?
A- Yes.
Q- That would mean that they never entered the FAG baggage control system?
A- No. As has been said, if the flight were there earlier, three-quaters of an hour earlier, then it would be entered into the system. (like the premature arrival of PA-643, 13:02 hours, from Berlin-Tegel, MEBO)
But if the flight arrived later, then the baggage was taken directly to the other plane. Q- Well, that's what I wanted to be clear about, because I think there may have been a bit of confusion about that earlier. If there was time to use the FAG system, were Pan Am bags inserted into it? A- Yes. Lord Sutherland: Thank you, Mr. O'Neil. That's all.+++
Chronology of flight OA 1711:
Flight OA 1711 was in Frankfurt on-bloc on position Gate 44 at 12:45. That's why the storage-room BO 44 was occupied until 15:09. At 15:25 the airplane from flight OA 1711 had to be moved to position 49 to deblock the storage-room BO 44 and Gate 44 for the aircraft from flight (PA-124)=PA-103/A.
Other investigation results that prove that no bomb-bag (Tray B-8849) was loaded from AirMalta KM-180 onto PanAm 103/A:
> From total 136 pieces of baggage (also approved by the BKA and FAA) which were loaded onto PA-103/A to Heathrow, only the 25 Transfer-baggages which came over the FRA conveyance system must be examined closely, because the remnant 111 pieces of baggage can definitely be assigned to passengers or air-companies and are excluded from being transfered by AirMalta.
> From these 25 baggage loaded on PA-103/A via the conveyance System only 3 pieces of baggage must be examined closely. The remnant 22 pieces of baggage can be attributed with no doubt:
> 1 Bag, Tray No. B-5070, coded on Interline-Counter HM-3 in FRA, Halle Mitte (Middle Hall), HM. Code: S0074+Z1320-- BP-- HS23+Z1529.
This unaccompanied inter-line bag was forwarded with a PTM "Forward Message" from Alitalia flight AZ 422 and was a "lost and found-suitcase" from Susan Costa, officially examined by the BKA/FAA.
> 1 Bag, Tray No. B-8042, coded at Interline-Counter HM-5 in FRA, Halle Mitte, HM. Code: S-0070+Z1317--BP--HS13+Z1513.
This accompanied inter-line bag belonged to Transit-passenger no. 3, * Aubrey H. (The symbol (* ) indicates to an Inter-line-Passenger)
This inter-line bag, Tray No. 8042, was assigned wrongly by the BKA and FAA (eventually on purpose) to on-line passenger no. 131, Mrs. W. Wagenführ, from feeder flight PA-643 arriving from Berlin!
> By this deliberate and unperceived manipulation the inter-line bag from *Transit Passagier No.3, *Aubrey H. was missing in the conveyance system. As a consequence the interline-Counter 206, V-3 could be used at 13:07 for the alleged transfer of an alleged "Bomb-Bag" (Tray B-8849) from the storagehouse HS33 to PA-103/A!
But this on-line bag was doubtlessly transferred from flight PA-643 (not from AirMalta) and must be assigned to passenger no. 131, Mrs. W. Wagenführ from Berlin-Tegel.
> 24 pieces of 25 pieces of baggage can be excluded with absolut certainty. (13 inter-line bags and 11 on-line bags which were transferred over the inter-line conveyance system. Therefore the remnant bag, Tray B-8849, must be the on-line bag from passenger no. 131, Mrs. W. Wagenführ.
At the interline-Counter no. 206, hall V3 this on-line bag was coded wrongly at 13:07 as inter-line bag (S-0009+Z1307) and was transferred to the storagehouse (HS33+Z1517) from where it was transported to the storage-room at Gate BO 44 from 15:17 on, without X-ray Control, because he was acceptet as on-line.
> The on-line bag (Tray B-8849) was assigned wrongly to AirMalta, flight KM-180 by a fatal accident:
- Tray B-8849 was simultaneously coded with AirMalta baggage between 13:04 und 13:10, (13.07 at counter 206, V3);
- the wrong testimony of sworn witness, no. 35, Klaus Wunderlich at Kamp van Zeist;
- the wrong testimony of sworn witness no. 799, Mr. Gunther Kasteleiner at Kamp van Zeist.
Notabene: The judges at the trial in Kamp van Zeist had been deprived by Kasteleiner and Wunderlich of the information that the computer controlled conveyance system in Frankfurt could code simultaneously pieces of baggage from different airlines - on-line and inter-line (mixed) which were then brought to the store-rooms BO at the Gates of the schedulded flights or to the housestorage (HS) until they were called forward and loaded.
Therefore the assumption that bag B-8849 was transferred from AirMalta, - only because of B-8849 being coded simultaneously and together with the baggage from AirMalta KM-180, - is untenable and a careless assumption that can not be considered as an indication proof!
All this with fatal consequences for Mr. Abdelbaset al Megrahi and Libya...
RESULT: On the feeder flight PA-103/A from Frankfurt to London-Heathrow not one Samsonite suitcase - the alleged bomb suitcase, from AirMalta, flight KM-180 to PanAm flight PA-103/A - was loaded, but 3 unknown and unaccompanied luggage items from Lufthansa, flight LH-631 from Kuwait, ex tray no. B-4809, B-6001, B-7418.
All MEBO proofs are under copyright protected and belong to Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, Mebo Ltd., 8004, Zurich Switzerland.
Supported by investigation material from the BKA and the FAA:
> Passenger/Baggage list from FAA on PanAm flight F1042= (PA-103/A), 21. Dec. 1988;
> Official Passenger/Baggage list from flight PA-103/A from Frankfurt: C140V, 21.12.1988;
> Baggage/Loading list from flight PA-103/A KIK.SORT. TADD.881221, 21.12. 1988, Police Ref. DW 135;
> Documents: baggage-delivery F-A32, Police Ref. DW 128;
> BKA document No. 1790 on baggage-transport-system;
> BKA report ST 33 - 068507/88, HR:2327, investigationin context with the crash of PAN AM 103, Meckenheim, 02.07.1990;
> BKA, Police Ref. DW7b, Protocol of traffic control FA 11, Asissistant Gunther Kasteleiner on the handling of baggage at Frankfurt;
> BKA documents on baggage rebooking, Police Ref. DW 137;
> BKA documents on Transit interline Baggage X-ray B 46, shift from 9:00 to 17.00, 21.12.1988, Police Ref. DW 26;
> BKA documents, summary of worksheets (Arbeitszettel) from FA 32 baggage-service, Airport Frankfurt, Police Ref. DW 136;
> Mebo Interview with PA-643 Passenger no. 131, Mrs. W. Wagenführ, Berlin;
> Correspondence with the BKA, administrator for the PA-103 investigation, Commissioner Böhlefeld, Meckenheim.
> The book "SCOTBOM: Evidence and the Lockerbie Investigation", written by the former special agent of the task Force FBI/CIA for the (PanAm 103) investigation, Richard. A. Marquise, is not based on technical expertise, but a detective story, spicked with purposeful lies and full of untruth! Its purposeful intentions are clear: With wrong and manipulated evidence the truth in the PanAm 103 crash was covered at the damage of Libya and its official Abdelbaset Al Megrahi.
by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd. Switzerland
Switzerland, December 11, 2008
Open letter to:
First Minister Alex Salmond,
Lord Davidson, Advocate General for Scotland,
Advocate Elish Angiolini QC,
and to other personalities
20th anniversary of the PanAm 103 Tragedy over Lockerbie
With faith in his innocence and hope for the soon release of the political hostage and "Lockerbie victim 271, Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, painful suffering since April 6th, 1999 until now, innocent in scottish prisons.
The truth is the silence of the desert ...
With respect to the families of the PanAm 103 victims
******************************************************************
The turn in the Lockerbie-Affair is pre-programmed
At the first hearing on the 19th of October 2007 at the Appeal Court in Edinburgh suddenly confirms after more than 3 months the existence of a document „under national security"; but keeps ist content closed.
On the 20th of February 2008 the Federal Advocate Lord Davidson, QC, - Westminsters representative in Scottish matters – announced that the secret document "under national security" of an unnamed state was delivered to the British justice already in 1996. The content of the secred document is about the MST-13 timer fragment which allegedly detonated the bomb.
Prosecuting counsel Ronnie Clancy said the document had not come from the United States or its agencies like the CIA, although he did not disclose the country involved.
This important document the British justice was in possession of since 1996 was kept away from the judges at Camp Zeist, the judges at the first appeal and Megrahi's defence team.
The turn in the 'Lockerbie-Affair' began on 19th of Oktober 2007
Flashback:
On 4 July 1996 Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd handed over to the person, responsible for the investigation of the PanAm 103 crash, Commissioner Böhlefeld, Federal Bureau of Criminal Investigations (BKA), in Meckenheim Germany, PanAm documents by MEBO, which proved that the luggage item Tray No. B-8849 was not transferred by AirMalta flight KM-180 on PA-103/A. The luggage item belonged to passenger No.131, W. Wagenführ, and came from Berlin with the feeder flight PA-643.
The document, FA32 luggage delivery no. 0000158, policy reference DW 128, was a falsification!
Earlier Mebo Ltd. had also presented to the Federal Bureau of Criminal Investigations (BKA) an expert's assessment over the true background of the fragment of the MST-13 timer, which activated allegedly the bomb, which brought Boeing 747 down.
On the 13th of September 1996, the Crown Office received a Document, under national security, of a state secretly held (probably Germany) about the MST-13 Timer and of decisive errors in the BKA report, ST33-068507/88, about the wrong bag-transfer in Frankfurt and the origin of the alleged "Malta-Bomb" Bag, Tray B 8849.
The Lord Justice General’s decision to keep the secret document (received the 13th of September 1996) under closure indicates again very clearly, that the whole process against Megrahi and Libya was from the very beginning a political process and not a fair criminal trial!
SECRET documents which could prove the innocence of the man Abdelbaset al Megrahi, convicted of the Lockerbie bombing, are not accessible until today. The UK Government by Advocate General Lord Davidson QC, blocked the progress and has argued that it is not in the public interest to release the secret document. He claimed: "The national security was at stake"!!!
Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerland can prove today with german investigation documents from the BKA: on the feeder flight PA-103/A from Frankfurt to London-Heathrow, not one Samsonite suitcase - the alleged bomb suitcase (B 8849) from AirMalta, flight KM-180 to PanAm flight PA-103/A - was loaded, but 3 unknown and unaccompanied luggage items from Lufthansa, flight LH-631 from Kuwait, items B-4809, B-6001, B-7418.
The alleged "Bomb bag" was a normal online bag, Tray no: B-8849, from Berlin flight PA-643, passenger no. 131, W. Wagenführ; coded in Frankfurt via counter V3-206, code S-0009+Z1307); (Prod.1089, PTM-telex from PanAm company, after offbloc PA-643, 11:26 hour in Berlin, text: from flight PA-643 >> to PA 103B/21-LHRO/0/1/ B1 > (1 passenger+1 bag > B1) police reference DW 125;
This bag Tray no. B-8849 from passenger 131, W. Wagenführ, was checked out at Heathrow.
That gives the warranty that this bag was not loaded on the main flight PA 103 to New York!
The prosecution should also order an inquiry concerning the bag B-8849 and the MST-13 timer-fragment via international legal assistance from Switzerland inerrogate Edwin Bollier (MEBO) and Eng. Ulrich Lumpert.
If the defense team Kelly should ignore the information, then we must ask the question, whether it actually acts on behalf of its mandator!?
It is negligent that since the year 2000 until today about 30 attorneys of Mr. Megrahi' s defence team have not considered these determining facts!!!
No bomb-bag from AirMalta KM 180
The alleged bombbag (B-8849) came not from Malta but from Berlin with passenger no. 131, W. Wagenführ, as on-line bag from feederflight PA-643, (Prod. 1089, Police Referenz DW 125; PanAm Telex after offbloc PA-643, 11:26 hour in Berlin:
ZCZC FSA 0207, PTM: PA0643/21> PA103/21--LHRO/0/1 B1).
This bag (Tray B-8849) although an on-line piece of baggage was wrong coded as inter-line bag on counter V3-206 but not x-rayed, because it was actually an online baggage that had been already X-ray checked in Berlin.
This on-line bag (B-8849) wrong coded as inter-line bag got the code S0009+Z13:07. This happened at the same time (13:07 hour) when the inter-line baggage from AirMalta, KM-180, (code S0009+Z13:04-13:10) was coded at the same counter V3-206.
Therefore the wrong acceptance at the court in Kamp van Zeist 2000/2001, that the alleged bombbag (B-8849) was transfered by AirMalta, KM-180 onto PanAm, PA-103/A!!
Day 38, July 21, 2000, trail Kamp van Zeist:
Mr. Gunther Kasteleiner was traffic assistant at the baggage handling central station FAG in Frankfurt. As ex witness no. 799 at the trial in Kamp van Zeist, he gave a wrong testimony about the 25 transfer baggages on flight PA-103/A. The question from Q was, how many items inter-line baggage are recorded?--
Kasteleiner sworn (original):
A- Yes. That's 25 different pieces of inter-line baggages.
Q- And were some of those items coded in at hall middle?
A- Yes.-
Q- And were others coded in V3?-
A Yes.
Correct is: 13 pieces of inter-line baggages and 12 pieces of on-line baggages (wrong coded as inter-line) via the conveyancing system.
Important: The bag, Tray B-8849 from Berlin (flight PA-643) was an on-line bag, wrongly coded as inter-line bag.
Important: for example: A luggage item from air Malta would have been inter-line.
Through the wrong statement, Gunther Kasteleiner, the court had accepted, the bag came from AirMalta, KM-180!
Thus witness Gunther Kasteleiner (sworn) traffic assistant FAG, is responsible for this fatal error, inter-line, instead of correctly on-line, solely the bag B-8849 could be assigned to AirMalta flight KM-180 !!!
It has been confirmed that the alleged bombbag no. B-8849 which had been coded over the counter V3-206 at 13.07 hour with code S-0009+Z1307, was forwarded on the moving floor (track in the main area HS33+Z1514) and singled out at 15.23 hour (code HS33+Z1514) to F1042/PA-103/A:
Tray: B 8849 F1042 S0009+Z1307--TO--HS33+Z1517--BO44+Z1523 V3
There was no inter-line bomb suitcase (B-8849) coming from Air Malta flight KM-180!
B-8849 was arriving on-line from Berlin /PA-643, W. Wagenführ and was not loaded from Airplane PA-643, direct to Airplane PA-103/A, but via the inter-line counter V3-206.
Further wrong assumption by the BKA
Of totally 136 luggage items loaded on flight, PA-103/A, inclusive of 25 pieces: 13 inter-line bag's (X-rayed) and 12 on-line baggage from Berlin (not X-rayed) and wrongly accepted as inter-line baggage were transfered onto shuttles flight PA-103/A, over the baggage conveyance system at airport Frankfurt.
Important part of the passenger/luggage list, C-140V.
It shows that according to the passenger/baggage list only 3 passengers with each 3 bags were transported on PA-103/A, but additional 3 unaccompanied and unknown inter-line bags from Lufthansa, flight LH-631, from Kuwait; dubious??
MEBO EXAMINATION
Important:
From the 124 passengers at Frankfurt who checked in for flight PA-103/A, only 3 passenger had each 3 luggage items, according to the passenger list C140V.
> Passenger no. 143, T. Walker, actually traveled with his 3 luggage items (3M) with the same flight LH-631 from Kuwait to Frankfurt. Around 15:57 hour, at the transit checking counter in Frankfurt airport, Mr. Walker checked in with his 3 luggage items as tray No. B-7056, B-9531, B-11366;
> Passenger no. 99, K. Noonan had 3 luggage items (3 M): tray No. B-3546, B-10773, B-10467. These luggage items were forwarded over the inter-line counter No. 203;
> Passenger no. 152, J. Waido checked in 3 luggage items (3 M) at the Head Checking Counter in Frankfurt: Tray No. B-3593, B-4120, B-11511.
An expert of the conveyance system in Frankfurt confirmed also MEBO's investigations that 3 pieces of unknown, unaccompanied inter-line baggage with tray numbers B-4809, B-6001, B-7418, had ben loaded at Frankfurt from flight LH-631 (Kuwait) to PanAm 103/A:
Tray:B 4809 F1042 S0074+Z1444--BP--HS33+Z1514--BO44+Z1521 HM
Tray:B 6001 F1042 S0074+Z1445--BP--HS33+Z1515--BO44+Z1522 HM
Tray:B 7418 F1042 S0074+Z1446--BP--HS13+Z1514--BO44+Z1521 HM
Thus it is absolutely clear that three additional inter-line luggage items (B-4809, B-6001, B-7418 coded over the inter-line counter HM-3) from flight LH-631 arriving from Kuwait and then transfered to flight PA-103/A don't belong to passenger no. 143, T. Walker as the BKA supposed falsely! An irresponsible mistake due to the BKA's sloppy investigations.
It is not clear up today whether these three mysterious baggage items were loaded in London-Heathrow on the mainflight, PA-103 to NewYork (JFK). Commissioner Hans Jürgen Fuhl (ex Crown Witness no. 566) from the German Federal Criminal Investigations Bureau (BKA) testified at Camp van Zeist: "in Heathrow documents were destroyed"…
Summary of the original testimony of Commissioner Hans Jürgen Fuhl from BKA (ex Crown Witness 566):
Other organisations who were investigating the bombing in London Heathrow had taken some of the documentation before the BKA could get its hands on it. Fuhl also testified that PanAm had apparently instructed staff at Heathrow to destroy documentation. (Ref. Doc.1 Chapter 13, page 38)
RESULT: On the feeder flight PA-103/A from Frankfurt to London-Heathrow not one Samsonite suitcase - the alleged bomb suitcase (B-8849) from AirMalta, flight KM-180 to PanAm flight PA-103/A - was loaded, but 3 unknown and unaccompanied luggage items from Lufthansa, flight LH-631 from Kuwait, items B-4809, B-6001, B-7418.
If the ex Denfence team of Mr. Megrahi, Duff & Taylor, at the trial in Kamp van Zeist and at the first Appeal had clinged to Edwin Bollier' s advice (Bollier's PanAm103 Disertation), the statement that a bomb suit-case with a MST-13 timer from air Malta KM-180 was transferred in Frankfurt on PA-103/A would have been dismissed in favour of Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi' who would be a free man like Mr Fhimah since February 2001 …
Duff & Taylor weren't ready to share with MEBO $ 200 millions, Libya had offered in 2000 in case Libya's innocence would be confirmed at the trial. For these reasons Duff & Taylor put their attention on the PFLP-GC-story what ended in a total disaster and in a blatant miscarriage of justice.
by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerlnd
All MEBO proofs are under copyright protected and belong to Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, Mebo Ltd., 8004, Zurich Switzerland.
MEBO announces its investigation proofs:
Luggage items loaded and transport on flight PA-103/A, from Frankfurt to Heathrow:
Total 136 pieces (guarantee on BKA Rapport ST 33-068507/88 of 2.July 1990) consisting of:
- 119 piece accompanied luggage items of passenger, according to passenger/baggage list C140V: (Zeist prod.199);
- 17 pieces unaccompanied luggage items, according to load list PA-103/A, KIK computer printout, TADD 881221, police ref. DW 135). (via the baggage conveyancing system FRA);
11 pieces on-line wrong coded as interline), 6 pieces inter-line;
Tray no: B-0622, B-1898, B-4941, B-8238, B-12244, B-11435, B-10852, B-6696, B-6559, B-6391, B-2377, from Berlin flights PA-637/PA-639/PA-107107; (Counter HM-4)
Tray no: B-3148, B-4573 from LH-241 (ex Adolph Weinacker); Counter HM-2;
Tray no; B-5070, from flight AZ-421, (ex Susan Costa); Counter HM-3;
Tray no: B-7418, B-6001, B-4809, from Kuwait, with Lufthansa flight LH-631, all 3 bag items unaccompanied and the owner is unknown ! Counter HM-3;
Details
- 8 luggage items of passenger: 7 pieces inter-line + (1 piece on-line, wrong coded as interline) accompanied (via the conveyancing system FRA);
Tray no: B-3546, B-10773, B-10467, from flight LH-1453, passenger no.99, K. Noonan; Counter V3-203, code S-0012+time
Tray no: B-5203, B-5936, from flight LH-1453, pasenger no.30, Patric M.Coyle; Counter V3-204; code S-0011+time
Tray no: B-5820, from passenger no.10, L. Bennett, Counter HM-3; code S-0074+time;
Tray no: B-8042, from passenger no.3, H. Aubrey, Counter HM-5, code S-0070;
Tray no: B-8849, from Berlin flight PA-643, passenger no.131, W. Wagenführ; Counter V3-206;code S-0009+time;
- 86 bags items of passenger registered on the KIK computer printout TADD 881221, have a code between: S-0500 to S-0600 + time (via checking counter airport Frankfurt, FRA).
- 25 bags items of passenger direct transfer, airplane to airplane, not via conveyancing system at Frankfurt, bags have no Tray numbers, PTM- telex from Berlin flight, PA-647 (21 bags); PTM- telex from Berlin flight, PA-649 (4 bags), (Prod. no,1089, Police Reference DW 25)
- 111 bags on the load list KIK TADD 881221 for flight PA-103/A consists of 86 bags , with code numbers between S-0500 to S-0600+ time, and 25 bags 13 piece inter-line, 12 piece on-line (wrong coded as interline) via the conveyancing system.
- 119 bags on the Pasenger/Baggage list V140V, consists of 86 bags of passenger with code numbers between S-0500 to S-0600+ time, and 25 bags of passenger from Berlin flights PA-647(21 bags) and PA-649 (4 bags) direct loading onto PA-103/A, without code or Tray number, registered only on PTM telex, (prod.1089) + 7 pieces of inter-line + (1 piece of on-line, wrong coded as interline) accompanied (via the conveyancing system FRA): >
- 136 bags Total: consists of baggage on load list KIK TADD 881221 for PA-103/A, 111 bags + 25 bags from Berlin flights PA-647 (21 bags) and PA-649 (4 Bags), without Tray and code number, only 3 PTM telexe, prod 1089, Police Reference DW 125;
by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerland
All MEBO proofs are under copyright protected and belong to Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, Mebo Ltd., 8004, Zurich Switzerland.
November, 28th, 2008
The scottish provocation:
We are neither pessimistic nor optimistic about Megrahi's appeal, but we are determined to reveal the Scottish miscarriage of justice with our exonerating evidence and thus help to rehabilitate Libya and give Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi his honour back.
We will prove that Libya and Mr Al Megrahi had absolutely nothing to do with the PanAm 103 bombing!
A revised judgement in favour of Libya and its official Mr. Megrahi will rise Libya's international reputation and the prestige of Libya's leader Muammar Gaddafi and his son Seif al-Islam Gadhafi, who was a key figure in normalizing Libya's relations with the World and make the international community aware of the unjust UN-embargo against Libya and its people.
It is so simple to prove: No Bag transfer from air Malta, KM-180 onto PanAm PA-103/A
- 3 Bags, Tray no. B-4809, B-6001, B-7418; unaccompanied from flight LH-631 from Kuwait, via (HM-3) inter-line.
- 1 Bag, Tray no. B-8042; Passenger, H.Aubrey, via (HM-5). inter-line.
- 1 Bag, Tray no. B-5620; Passenger, L. Bennett, via (HM-3) inter-line.
- 1 Bag, Tray no. B-5620; unaccompanied, from Roma, flight AZ-422, ex. S. Costa, via (HM-3) inter-line.
- 2 Bags, Tray no. B-3148, B-4573; unaccompanied, from flight LH-241, ex pass. A. Weinacker, via (HM-2) inter-line.
- 2 Bags, Tray no. B-5203, B5936; from flight, LH-1453, passenger P.M. Coyle, via (V3-204) inter-line.
- 1 Bag, Tray no. B-8849; from Berlin, flight PA-643, passeng. no.131, W. Wagenführ, via (HM-206) on-line, wrongly accepted as inter-line!! (without X-ray)
- 11 Bags, Tray no. B-0622, B-1898, B-4971, B-8238, B-12244, B-11435, B-10852, B-6696, B-6559, B-6391, B-2377; from Berlin, flight PA-637/639/107 on-line, wrongly accepted as inter-line!! (without X-ray)
--------
- 25 Bags total
All luggage items, total 25 pieces of baggage, 13 inter-line bag's (X-rayed) and 12 on-line baggage from Berlin (not X-rayed) and wrongly accepted as inter-line baggage were transfered onto shuttles flight PA-103/A, over the baggage conveyance system at airport Frankfurt.
No luggage item came from AirMalta flight KM-180!!
Unfortunately, the on-line Bag from Berlin flight PA-643, Tray no. B-8849 was given the the code S0009+Z13:07 at the same time (13:07) together with the inter-line baggage from AirMalta, KM-180, (code S0009+Z13:04-13:10) by the same Counter V3-206. Therefore the wrong acceptance at the court in Kamp van Zeist 2000/2001, that the bag was transfered by AirMalta, KM-180 onto PanAm, PA-103/A!!
The remaining 86 pieces of baggage from 111 pieces listed on the load list, KIK.Sort.TADD, 881221, PA-103/A, production 1060, (Zeist), police reference: DW135, can be assigned without problems to the respective passengers or airlines.
°°°
Important part of the passenger/luggage list, C-140V.
It shows that according to the passenger/baggage list not only 3 passengers with each 3 bags were transported on PA-103/A, but additional 3 unaccompanied inter-line bags from Lufthansa, flight LH-631, from Kuwait; dubious??
- 3 Bags, Tray No. B-7056, B-9531, B-11366; Passenger no. 143, T. Walker, via (Transit-Check.count. FRA) in-line
- 3 Bags, Tray No. B-3593, B-4120, B-11511; Passenger no. 152, J. Waido, via (Check. count. FRA). in-line
- 3 Bags, Tray no. B-3546, B-10773, B-10467; Passenger no. 99, K. Noonan, via (V3-203). inter-line
- 3 Bags, Tray no. B-4809, B-6001, B-7418; unaccompanied from flight LH-631 from Kuwait, via (HM-3) inter-line
by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerland
27th November, 2008
Today and tomorrow the ninth Appeal hearing is taking place at the High Court in Edinburgh. Very hopefully the long overdue truth isn't further delayed intentionally for the Damage of Libya and at the Cost of Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi's Life!
A doubtful anniversary
Seventeen years ago, on November 14, 1991 the US of Justice and the Crown Office in Scotland accused two Libyan Officials for murder of the 270 victims of the PanAm 103 disaster!
On January 31, 2001, Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi was convicted of murder by a panel of three Scottish judges and sentenced to 27 years in prison. The second accused Mr. Lamin Khalifah Fhimah was acquitted.
Megrahi's appeal against his conviction was refused on March 14, 2002. On September 23, 2003 Megrahi applied to the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) for his conviction to be reviewed, and on 28 June 2007 the SCCRC announced its decision to refer the case to the High Court in Edinburgh after it found he may have suffered a miscarriage of justice.
Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi's unfortunate destiny was to become Lockerbie victim no. 271 as a political hostage, because the PanAm 103 assassination attempt was used for a conspiracy against Libya.
Coincidentally and shortly before the 20th anniversary of the tragedy it has been confirmed that only 3 passengers had each 3 luggage items loaded on PanAm flight PA-103/A at Frankfurt airport on Dezember 21, 1988. (Corresponding with the passenger/luggage list, C-140V and FAG KIK TADD 881221 computer printout).
Thus it is proven that 3 inter-line bags, unknown and unaccompanied, were transported by Lufthansa flight LH-631 from Kuwait and were additionally loaded at Frankfurt on the feeder flight PanAm PA-103/A to London/Heathrow airport!
Until today remains unexplained to whom these 3 luggage items belonged and whether they were loaded on flight PanAm 103 from London to New York?
MEBO EXAMINATION
Important:
From the 124 passengers at Frankfurt who checked in for flight PA-103/A, only 3 passenger had each 3 luggage items, according to the passenger list C140V.
MEBO cover-up:
- Passenger no.143, T. Walker, actually traveled with his 3 luggage items (3M) with the same flight LH-631 from Kuwait to Frankfurt. Around 15:57 clock at the transit checking counter in Frankfurt airport, Mr. Walker checked in with his 3 luggage items as tray No. B-7056, B-9531, B-11366.
- Passenger no. 99, K. Noonan had 3 luggage items (3 M): tray No. B-3546, B-10773, B-10467. These luggage items were forwarded over the inter-line counter No. 203;
- Passenger no. 152, J. Waido checked in 3 luggage items (3 M) at the Head Checking Counter in Frankfurt: Tray No. B-3593, B-4120, B-11511.
Thus it is absolutely clear that the additional 3 inter-line luggage items (trays no. B-4809, B-6001, B-7418 coded over the inter-line counter HM-3) from flight LH-631 arrival from Kuwait and then transfered to flight PA-103/A don't belong to passenger T. Walker as the BKA supposed falsely! An irresponsible mistake due to the BKA's sloppy investigations.
RESULT: On the feeder flight PA-103/A from Frankfurt to London-Heathrow not one Samsonite suitcase - the alleged bomb suitcase, from AirMalta, flight KM-180 to PanAm flight PA-103/A - was loaded, but 3 unknown and unaccompanied luggage items from Lufthansa, flight LH-631 from Kuwait, ex tray no. B-4809, B-6001, B-7418!
It is not clear up today whether this mysterious baggage items were loaded in London-Heathrow on the mainflight, PA-103 to NewYork (JFK). Commissioner Hans Jürgen Fuhl (Crown Witness no. 566) from the German Federal Criminal Investigations Bureau (BKA) testified at Camp van Zeist: "in Heathrow documents were destroyed"…
Summary of the original testimony of Commissioner Hans Jürgen Fuhl from BKA (Crown Witness 566):
Other organisations who were investigating the bombing had taken some of the documentation before the BKA could get their hands on it. Fuhl also testified that PanAm had apparently instructed staff at Heathrow to destroy documentation. (Ref. Doc.1 Chapter 13 page 38)
Totally 3 luggage items (2+1) planned for that far transport, were never loaded onto PanAm Main flight PA-103.
- unaccompanied on-line luggage item, a brown Samsonite suit-case with rush tags, of PanAm copilot John Hubbard, was never loaded onto PA-103.
- inter-line luggage items of Daniel O'Connor (A State department official) were never loaded onto PA-103.
All 3 bags were found after the atrack on PA-103 into the baggage room at airport Heathrow...
Questions: How could the load list of the Boing 747, PA-103 be correct, if 3 luggage items were missing?
Were the 3 luggage items in Heathrow exchanged with the mysterious 3 luggage items from flight LH-631/PA-103/A from Kuwait to Frankfurt to Heathrow, with the 3 luggage items of Daniel O'Connor (2M) and John Hubbard (1M)?
Had therefore in Heathrow the documents of the PanAm-103 to be destroyed?
New Lockerbie posts on Professor Dr. Robert Black's lockerbie case blogspot ...
The great interest for the new Lockerbie blog entitled 'The Masonic Verses' - Lockerbie and Related Scams has to be welcomed. The blog takes the form of a critique of the evidences around the bombing of the PanAm flight PA-103 and informs on doubtful proofs.
MEBO will publish soon on its webpage: www.lockerbie.ch and in comments and letters rebutted in a review a lot of evidence in connection with the official Police- und FAA investigations between 1990-2008 used for the wrong accusation of Megrahi and Fimah.
And a lot of this material was discovered by MEBO Ltd first.
For examples:
- the manipulated fragment of a MST-13 timer;
- no bomb suit-case from AirMalta (KM-180) transfer to PanAm (PA-103/A) in Frankfurt;
- no blue baby overall sell through shopkeeper Tony Gautci (Mary House) in Malta;
- the security observation visit, of Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, alias Ahmed Khalifa Abdusamad, to Malta (ordered by his chief El Bishari) from the 20th to the 21th of December 1988, have nothing to do with the Lockerbie tragedy;
- the important distance between the bomb and the skin of the aircraft Boeing 747, (25 inch), published in the official Air Accident Investigation Report (AAIB) etc.
Mebo pointed out before start of the process at Kamp van Zeist, on 3 May 2000, in a letter to Lord Advocate Colin Boyd, that this distance of 25 inch that the "Bomb case" was placed before the container AVE 4041 and not in the container (see the pictures).
This was confirmed in a report by explosive expert Professor Dr. Hiltmar Schubert from the Fraunhofer Institut in Munich, Germany!
The court adjourned for 10 days and brought in a second expert to clarify this question and concluded that the distance was fortuitious ...
by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerland
14th November, 2008
The High Court in Edinburgh refused to day to release the political hostage and "Lockerbie victim 271", Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi, and rejected his appeal to be freed on bail because he has terminal cancer. Mr Megrahi will remain in jail while his appeal continues...
Mr Megrahi, winner is the truth !
The next step for the coming appeal case (subject miscarriage of justice) is a hearing, assigned for 27th and 28th November 2008. At this hearing parties will discuss their proposals in relation to case management and a time plan for the final appeal.
The Scottish PanAm 103-Indication Process was based on falsified and manipulated evidence
The circumstantial evidence used to implicate Libya and his official Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi in the Lockerbie bombing was a FAKE! It is high time that the second delayed appeal brings light into this clear and impertinent miscarriage of justice.
The Lockerbie Prophecy
The second appeal judgement in the "Lockerbie Affair" will reveal the scandalous fraud against Libya: a clear and deliberate miscarriage of justice! (conspiracy against Libya)
That’s why the Crown is delaying and protracting their final decision ! Their only concern is how to back out of the affair and save the respectability of the Scottisch and British Legal System.
But their tactics to cover up the truth about the conspiracy against Libya will be in vain.
The Scottish politicians and Lord Advocates should already prepare which measures to take against the three Judges responsible for the misjugdement, if Megrahi's appeal will be proved a miscarriage of justice by the High Court in Edinburgh?
Nevertheless the damage is done. Moral damage for Mr Abdulbaset al-Megrahi: Up to now 9,7 painful years (from 27 years) suffering innocently as political hostage in Scottish prisons.
Extorted compensation payments to the relatives of those killed in the Lockerbie bombing in the amount of US$ 2.7 billions.
Compensation payments for the destroyed Boing 747 and the bankrupt of Pan American Airways company: approximately US$ 140 mio.
Financial damage for MEBO Ltd.: US$ 60 mio.
Financial damage by the UN-embargo for the Libyan State: approximately US$ 40 billions! Not to forget that the Libyans people suffered severely under the sanctions
Prestige damage worldwide for Great Britain and Scotland: immeasurable…
by Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerland
27th October, 2008
The Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (EDA/FDFA) delivered to Libya on the 25th of October 2008 officially the assurance that Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi can stay and be treated for his illness in a Swiss hospital, after his release in Scotland.
Cordial thanks to the Federal Councilor Mrs Micheline Calmy-Rey, Head of the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs.
We wish Mr Abdulbaset Al Megrahi to get healthy and free soon and ask for ALLAH'S assistance, ... ALLAHU AKBAR ...
by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerland
18th October, 2008
Mr. Abdelbaset Ali Al-Megrahi, "Lockerbie Victim no. 271"
Congratulation for the work of solicitor Mr Tony Kelly. It is an important victory for Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi and for the forthcoming prestige of the Leader of Libya, Muammar al-Gadhafi, after winning the appeal.
The next hearing on the High Court in Edinburgh is planned to take place on the 27th and 28th of November 2008.
MEBO’s comment:
The desision of the appeal court confirms that the procedures of the SCCRC-tests for a reappeal were absolutely not in accordance with the standards of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.
On the 28th of June 2007, Mr Megrahi’s lawers, rejected the SCCRC-ruling as fabrication.
Solicitor Tony Kelly said:
We don’t have to limit our appeal on the grounds the Commission has identified. We have carte blanche to make it on as many grounds as we want.
This includes the claims about the most important fragment of the bomb’s timing mechanism that was allegedly found in the countryside near Lockerbie in the months after the atrocity.
+++
The Commission deliberately suppressed among other things, the evidence concerning the two times manipulated MST-13 Timer fragment. On top of that a high ranking Scottish official is deliberately holding back MEBO’s criminal complaint regarding the falsification of evidence since the 11th of June 2000.
The revision of the wrong judgement against the Libyan Official Abdelbaset al Megrahi in the Lockerbie-case must first of all start with the rejection of the former line of argumentation concerning the manipulated fragment of a MST-13 timer (PT/35B) by the Scottish Justice.
Reason: the first implication of Libya with the PanAm 103 bombing was based only on the wrong conclusion at Kamp van Zeist and its first appeal that the decisive piece of evidence - the manipulated fragment of a MST-13 timer - did originate from a timer delivered to Libya.
Today with BKA documents it can be proved beyond all doubt that on the 21th of December 1988 no "bomb bag" was loaded on AirMalta, flight KM-180 at Luqa airport and therefore none "Malta-bag" was transfered in Frankfurt on PanAm 103/A to Heathrow. The "Lockerbie-Case" was a miscarriage of Scottish Justice, because the court did not consider all the available exonerate evidence.
The alleged "bomb-bag", tray no. (B-8849) was not a inter-line bag from AirMalta (KM-180). This bag was a normal on-line bag, wrong coded as inter-line bag from Berlin-Tegel, flight PanAm, PA-643, and was checked out at London-Heathrow, from passenger no. 131, Wagenführ W.
Thus it is secured, that bag was not transfered on the main flight PA-103 to New York!
Therefore the security observation visit, of Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, alias Ahmed Khalifa Abdusamad, to Malta (ordered by his chief El Bishari) from the 20th to the 21th of December 1988, and his alleged infiltration of a "bomb bag" has no probative force any more!
The de-conspiracy of the conspiracy against Libya can begin…
by ebol, Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd, Switzerland
7th Oct 2008
Abdelbaset Ali Al-Megrahi is within sight
There are more and more accumulations of demonstrable evidence of proof falsifications that the Scottish Justice suppresses. How comes that the Scottish Justice does not resist the justified reproaches of Edwin Bollier (MEBO Ltd.) and ex-engineer Ulrich Lumpert (in his affidavit) in this crucial affair?
Reason: Because their allegations were developed on fundamental evidence (hardware) and the responsible persons behind the falsifications of this crucial evidence would be exposed!
It would be easy, the Scottish Justice could as before in 1990/91, let fatal reproaches be examined for the truth with international legal assistance from Switzerland.
NB: (PII) With the non-opening of the document under "National Security", the Scottish Justice wants to protect the same official people who through falsification of evidence held Libya and Mr. Megrahi responsible for the attack 0n PanAm 103 …
Legally justified points of views (software) of lawyers are important and needed, however they are questionable (controversial) and time-consuming.
The fact is that we have only the defence evidence (hardware), - the manipulated MST-13 timer fragment (PT/35B) - to prove that Libya's and Megrahi's had nothing to do with the PanAm 103 assassination attempt.
The central fragment MST-13, (PT/35B) which is the only piece of evidence to connect Libya allegedly with the PanAm 103 assassination attempt, lies in the archive of the Scottish High Court and is ruled out today as proof, because it has not a in-scratched letter "M" on it. Thus it is free of doubts a falsification!
"To cash in as much as possible money from Libya", is the slogan of the Solicitors: "Money, money, money and more funds to delay the process unnecessarily. Mr. Megrahi and Libya's Solicitors Duff & Taylor, Mac Kechnie and Tony Kelly etc. until today, after 10 years, did not rehabilitate Mr. Abdelbaset Ali Al Megrahi and Libya.
The cause: All Solicitors involved had obviously or deliberately failed to appropriate suitable special experts, who can determine and put the defence evidence of MEBO Ltd. (hardware and software) into the center of the defense.
(Today in the focus: As can be proved, no "Bomb bag" loaded in Malta and no MST-13 fragment of a timer etc. supplied to Libya.
by Edwin Bollier
21th Sep 2008
against Libya, in the name of Great Britain?
The bombing of PanAm 103 on the 21th of Dezember 1988 killing all 259 people on board and 11 inhabitants in Lockerbie was not motivated by a revenge of Libya against the United States for the U.S. airstrikes on Tripoli and Benghazi on the 14th of April 1986 killing 41 people, including leader Moammar Al Gadhafi's adopted daughter.
There was no motive for Libya to bomb PA-103. Libya and the official Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi don’t have anything to do with the Lockerbie tragedy. This is a deliberate and bad-willing assumption, a conspiracy against Libya.
The opening of the document "under national security" would bring the proof for a miscarriage of justice and the freedom for Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi and Libya.
by Edwin Bollier
20th Sep 2008
covered in a document under national Security...
To prevent international legal assistance from Switzerland and the potential disgrace for the Scottish justice system and to divert at the same time from the explosive affidavit of Lumpert, the newspaper "The Herald" communicated on the 3rd of October 2007 that behind ground 5 of the SCCRC-report a top secret classified document "under national security" was hidden and that its content is about the MST-13 timer. This after the editor of the Herald was feeded with information from the secret and unpublished 800 pages report of the commission's findings.
At the first hearing on the 19th of October 2007 the Appeal court in Edinburgh suddenly confirmed after more than 3 months the existence of a document "under national security"; but keeps ist content closed.
Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini QC agreed on the 20th of February 2008 to open the secret document but the UK Government by Advocate General Lord Davidson, QC, - Westminster's representative in Scottish matters - refused so and argued that it was not in the public interest to release the secret document. He claimed higher national interests: "The national security was at stake"!!!
Seemingly the content of the document "under national security" (MST-13 timer) is so high-explosive that the national security of Great Britain is at stake !!!
Prosecuting counsel Ronnie Clancy added that the secret document did not originate from the USA or one of ist agencies as the CIA.
For provable special reasons only two countries come into consideration for having passed the document 'under national security' to Great Britain: Switzerland or Germany. Reason: The manipulated "Lockerbie MST-13 timer fragment" did not come from a timer supplied to Libya in 1985/86.
Why the national security in Great Britain would be in danger with the opening of the document?
At least these two ex RARDE experts, Dr.Thomas Hayes and Allen Feraday, were involved as officials in the manipulations of the MST-13 (PT/35) fragment and the falsifications in the examination report page 51, photo PP8932, PI/995, memorandum to Insp.William Williamson, etc.
At least this two officials experts were responsible for the deliberately wrong accusation by linking the MST-13 fragment to Libya and the PanAm 103 Tragedy. In reality the crown wants to protect Hayes and Feraday. They are a real problem for the public security in Great Britain, why?
Who gave the ex RARDE experts Dr.Thomas Hayes and all Feraday the order to falsifications evidence in context with the MST-13 (PT/35) fragment? Came the order from the state?
If RARDE experts Dr.Thomas Hayes and Allen Feraday acted in the name of the state remains covered until the police will prosecute these two officials for falsification of evidence.
This is the true reason for the non-disclosure of the document "under national security" (PII) ...
by Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd
10th Sep 2008
Abdelbaset al Megrahi, in the Lockerbie-affair
The revision of the wrong judgement against the Libyan Official Abdelbaset al Megrahi in the Lockerbie-case must first of all start with the rejection of the former line of argumentation concerning the manipulated fragment of a MST-13 timer (PT/35) by the Scottish Justice.
Reason: the first implication of Libya with the PanAm 103 bombing was based only on the wrong conclusion at Kamp van Zeist and its first appeal that the decisive piece of evidence - the manipulated fragment of a MST-13 timer - did originate from a timer delivered to Libya.
Based on this wrong conclusion was the attempt to involve Mr Megrahi into the crime by very questionable and wrong evidence from Malta. The affidavit of Ex-MEBO engineer Ulrich Lumpert from the 18th of July 2007 and his live declaration on ITV (August, 2008) in assistance of Dr. Jim Swire should make the appeal-court sit up and take notice ...
Today it can be proved that on the 21th of December 1988 no "bomb bag" was loaded on AirMalta, flight KM-180 at Luqa airport in Malta. Therefore the visit of Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, alias Ahmed Khalifa Abdusamad, to Malta from the 20th to the 21th of December 1988 and his alleged infiltration of a "bomb bag" has no evidence any more!
 |
Scottish Police Label no.995, a further evidence was tampered with to implicate Libya in the PanAm-103 bomb plot go to Link: Further evidence |
 |
3th Sep 2008
Richard Marquise in the "Lockerbie-Affair"?
Ex-FBI "Special" Agent and head of the Task Force in the "Lockerbie-Case", Richard A. Marquise, exposed himself with his own justifications! He is still defending and protecting FBI forensic expert Tomas Thurman, who was meanwhile convicted in the United States for having tampered with forensic evidence. Was he possibly the crucial perpetrator behind the conspiracy against Libya in the Lockerbie-Affair?
The content in Marquise's doc.-book "Scotbom: Evidence and the Lockerbie Investigation" leads to this conclusion! Mr. Richard A. Marquise confirms that there is no evidence against Libya. The fragment of a MST-13 timer fragment originated from a first handfabricated prototype not delivered to Libya. Top of form 1, bottom of form 2 for example, he confirms that the PT-35 = (MST-13) timer fragment descends from the first handfabricated prototype serie of 1985! ('Scotbom', Chapter 11)
Original excerpt, under Chapter 11:
After Lumpert's statement, Lumpert (ex-Engeneer at MEBO Ltd) was the first witness and after examining a photograph the PT-35, (MST-13 Fragment) testified the chip had come from a circuit board for a timer he designed and built in 1985 at the request of Bollier. ----------- He had learned one week prior to the hearing that this timer might have been used in a bomb.
He believed the chip had come from one of the first timers made. He detailed how he had designed this circuit board, nothing the slight imperfections on PT-35. Once the master board was made, the imperfections showed up on the other circuit boards from that master.
Why has ex-FBI Special Agent Marquise suppressed this most important proof in favour of Libya at the court in Kamp van Zeist? I am convinced his role and function in the "Lockerbie-fraud" will be revealed at the appeal. Hello to the memory: The MST-13 timers supplied to Libya were not prototypes of the first serie!
The truth at the High Court in Edinburgh will bring it shortly to the day … We require that Mr Marquise appears at the High Court in Edinburgh as a witness.
Edwin Bollier, VR MEBO Ltd
On September 1st, 2008 the month of fasting, Ramadan began for muslims. Message to the Scottish Justice in Edinburgh: After the current realizations, for instance, the statement of truth in engineer Lumpert's affidavit, please release Mr. Abdelbaset al Megrahi during the time of fresh judgement under electronic house detention (GPS surveillance) in his house in Glasgow, Scotland.
Thank you for your attention, Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd
21th August 2008
Today's procedural hearing related to the appellant's, Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi, two petitions for access to evidence-material used at the Zeist trial, or referred to in material used at the trial, including documents and photographs.
The Crown intimated that it was no longer opposing the appellant's application to be allowed to show the originals to an identification expert. The examination should take place in the presence of the Prof. Steve Clark, psychologist of the University of California, USA.
The most important aspect of today's hearing is the ease and speed with which the court dismissed the Crown's submissions and granted the appellant's requests.
Zurich, 14th Aug 2008
The deal will see as well US compensation paid for the Libyan victims for U.S. airstrikes on Tripoli and Benghazi on 14 April, 1986, killed 41 people, including leader Moammar Al Gadhafi's adopted daughter.
US President Bush expressed in a letter his greeting to the Leader Moammar Al Gathafi and his satisfaction about bilateral relations between Libya and United states of America. US President praised in his letter the Leader's continuous efforts for stability of the world, especially in Africa.
(By Edwin & Mahnaz Bollier)
Zurich, 4th Aug 2008
Libya-USA Packet-Claims Deal
Libya and USA have reached a comprehensive agreement to settle all controversial claims tied to Libya-related unprove terrorism from the 1980s. The agreement says: Libya to make a single payment of US$ 1 billion pro saldo all claims to a US government-administered entity. That entity would oversee the compensation for victims of the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 (remainder of payment US$ 536 mio) and victims of the 1986 La Belle nightclub bombing attack in Berlin (US$ 289 mio) and to victims of UTA-772 flight, 1989.
Important clearing-up:
Libya did pay all of the compensation under explicit objection that Libya had absolutely nothing to do with this terror acts and could therefore not be made responsible for eventually commited crimes by any of its citizens not acting on governmental instructions.
In the world media this objection is never mentioned. This tricky suppression of the whole statement by the world's leading news agencies leads to the generally accepted but nevertheless totally wrong notion: If they paid, they did it.
Libya, ask for the following US warranties; excerpt:
> In exchange for the money the US would formally immunize Libya from any further claims, and all American oil and financial companies -- which have been reluctant to invest in Libya while the lawsuits persisted -- could do business there without fear of penalty.
> Payment for the victims of the April 1986 US raid on Libya.
> Warranty for all efforts to secure the return of Libyan Abdelbasset Al-Megrahi from Scotland direct to Tripoli/Libya, after the acquittal by the Appeal High Court at Edinburgh. The Libyan is serving a prison sentence in Scotland after being found guilty in an completely unfair trial in Kamp van Zeist for the blowing up of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie.
Why Libya pays?:
> Regain full diplomatic and economic status. This would allow US oil companies to negotiate hundreds of billions of dollars worth of contracts, to drill the state's oilfields.
Again and again: Libya and the official Abdelbaset al Megrahi have nothing to do with the Lockerbie-Tragedy.
Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd. give the Crown, Lord Advocate General and the Appeal Court, the full warranty that the manipulated MST-13 timer fragment (PT-35B) does not come from a timer supplied to Libya and therefore cannot be brought in connection with Libya.
Yours faithfully
Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO LTd, Switzerland
LORD ADVOCATE GENERAL IN UNITED KINGDOM
Honorable Crown and Honorable Lord Advocate General,
There is no need to open the mysterious document under national security and it seems to be a waste of time. There is a simpler possibility: Please examine the original MST-13 timer-fragment with the scratched letter "M" and the 8 layers of fiber glass (reference evidence photo PI/995 of RARDE).
The examination should take place in the presence of the Prof. Steve Clark, of the University of California, USA, as an identification expert and under UN Observer Prof. Dr. Hans Koechler.
NB. The MST-13 timer supplied to Libya (1985-86) were equipped with PC boards with 9 layers of fiber glass.
Only the original MST-13 fragment, with 8 fiber glass layers and the marking "M" (Prototype) proves that the country of Libya and its official Abdelbaset Al Megrahi cannot be in connection with the "Lockerbie Tragedy"!
The MST-13 fragment was examined and sawed into two parts on 27th of April 1990 at the company Siemens AG, Munich Germany, by its vice Director, Johannes Brosamle. No doubt !!! Libya and his official Abdelbaset Al Megrahi were deliberately entangled with the bombing of PanAm 103 by the manipulated piece of evidence MST-13 timer fragment (PT-35B)
Yours faithfully
Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO LTd, Switzerland
Libyan Muslim Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, a shame!
Prior to the next public procedural hearing on August 20th 2008, there is to be a private hearing on August 19th involving only the Crown and the Advocate General. More than a year has passed since the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission referred Abdelbaset Megrahi's case back to the Criminal Appeal Court on the basis that his conviction might have amounted to a miscarriage of justice...
Abdelbaset Al Megrahi has called in Prof. Steve Clark, of the University of California, USA, as an ID-expert to compare and identify for instance the original FBI photos (Timer-Fragment MST-13), with photos and the hardware that were shown to witness Edwin Bollier in court in Kamp van Zeist.
Why again a delay and why has no date yet been fixed for the hearing of the appeal? The answer is simple: Probably racism, because Mr. Megrahi is citizen of a Muslim Country! This must end. The delay is becoming scandalous. The reputation of Scotland's criminal justice system is being further tarnished in the eyes of the world. Topic in the next meeting of the Arab league. Do not forget: Muslims have oil power, thank to ALLAH...
Read the DEPOSITION from Susan Lindauer, signed this 4th day of December, 1998 in the presence of a notary public. Their hearing started on the 7th of July, 2008 in New York USA.
The biggest fraud in the history of Scotland !
more information....
This is the key for the final proof that the MST-13 fragment
does not descend from a timer supplied to Libya.
PT-35B, joined from two parts: PT-35(b) + DP-31(a) = PT-35B
MEBO Proposal for a partial disclosure of the document "under national security"
In order that the content of the document "under national security" and the country involved are not publicly disclosed there is the possibility that
1 member of the SCCRC and 2 personalities either/or of the EU or the UNO
would have access to view this important document under the condition of not making the country involved and the content of the document public.
But the content of the document "under national security" could be used for the benefit of Abdelbaset al Megrahi's appeal proceedings.
In the sense of the Arab League. Edwin Bollier
The UK General Advocate Lord Davidson, QC, and the Scottish Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini, QC, can only delay the victory of truth in the "Lockerbie-scandal" but not prevent it ...
Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi exluded from prison exchange
Greatbritain did not take into account that unjustly sentenced Abdelbaset Al Megrahi would oppose leaving Scotland and spending the rest of his sentence in a Libyan prison without a complete and honourful reversal of his verdict. He strongly withhold any temptations to leave Scottish prisons by a political deal (Blair's "memorandum in the desert").
Megrahi's integrity against all pressure on him will ensure that the truth in the Lockerbie-Affair is not covered up completely.
To exclude Megrahi's prison exchange to Libya, Libyan’s minister of foreign affairs, Abdal Rahman Shalagan, will probably ratify on the 12th of March 2008 in London the memorandum over "the reciprocal extadition and transfer of prisoners"– under explicit exclusion of Abdelbaset Al Megrahi.
***
Already on the 8th of June 2007 MEBO published the following message on its webpage:
No secret deal over Mr Al Megrahi's prison exchange to Libya.
The only correct way for Mr Al Megrahi to prove his innocence is via the soon expected positive decision of Megrahi’s appeal bid by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) and through the verdict „not guilty“ by the Scottish High Court!
This is the correct way for Mr Al Megrahi to return honourfully to his homeland Libya. Al Megrahi has consistently maintained his innocence and vowed to stay in Scotland and win his freedom through the appeal courts.
***
Non-disclosure of the document "under national security"
As predicted the decision of the Lord Justice General on the 7 of March 2008 definitely not to open the document "under national security" to Megrahi’s defence will be used by the defence as a strong argument for the release of Abdelbaset Al Megrahi. The suppression of exonerating evidence for reasons of national security violates civil and human rights of the defendant and must be considered as a miscarriage of justice.
The Lord Justice General’s decision to keep the secret document (received the 13th of September 1996) under closure indicates again very clearly that the whole process against Megrahi and Libya was from the very beginning a political process and not a fair criminal trial!
such an important role in the "Lockerbie-scandal"?
The prosecution was already in possession of at least one MST-13 timer before the timer fragment was allegedly found in the collar of a T-shirt at the site of Lockerbie. This timer was used to set up the wrong trace to incriminate Libya and put heavy economical sanctions (embargo*) on Libya (1993). Then Mr Abdelbaset al Megrahi and Mr al-Amin Khalifa Fhima were found as scape-goats and indicted. For Megrahi's conviction the Malta-bombing-suitcase theorie was invented (2001).
***
*embargo
After the handing over of the two Libyans to Kamp Zeist (1999) the UN-embargo on Libya (since 1993) was provisionally lifted, after Libya's forced paying compensation (2003) to the descendants of the victims (US$ 2.7 billion) the sanctions were lifted definitely. Libya did pay compensation under explicit objection that the state of Libya had absolutely nothing to do with this terror act and could therefore not be made responsible for eventually commited crimes by any of its citizens not acting on governmental instructions.
In the world media this objection is never mentioned. This tricky suppression of the whole statement by the world's leading news agencies leads to the generally accepted but nevertheless totally wrong notion: If they paid, they did it.
***
The disclosure of the document "under national security" about the MST-13 timer would reveal the conspiracy against Libya and Megrahi not only as a miscarriage of justice but as criminal machinations of western secret services and their governments.
"under national security" in the Lockerbie-Affair?
Chronology:
In the run of the criminal investigations in the Lockebie-Affair the Swiss Federal Police (BUPO) in April 1990 showed FBI-Polaroid-Fotos of a fragment of an electronic board to the owners of MEBO Ltd (Erwin Meister and Edwin Bollier).
Edwin Bollier understood quickly, that the pictures showed a fragment of a MST-13 timer PC-board fabricated by MEBO.
At a close inspection Bollier noticed an important detail that the PC-board originated from a handmade Prototype and that it was fabricated from a non-functioning MST-13 timer.
After further interviews through FBI-Officials and officers of the Scottish Police in Zurich and after Bollier's visites in 1991 at the FBI in Washington and at the Scottish Police in Glasgow he understood clearly: The allegedly found MST-13 timer fragment in Lockerbie was a manipulated piece of evidence with the intention to link the state of Libya with the Lockerbie-atrocity.
In 1991 Bollier was invited to the FBI Headquarter in Wahington and Commissioner Richard Marquise offered him up to 4 million US$ and a new identity in the States if he would confirm in a police statement that the allegedly found MST-13 timer fragment originated from one of the 20 timers delivered to Libya between 1985 und 1986.
Now there was no more doubt for Bollier that a huge conspiracy against Libya was on the way.
Contrary to the Libyan crown witness against Libya, Abdul Jiacha, - an agent in the sold of the CIA – Bollier rejected the offer. Jiacha is currently living in the USA under a new identity.
Bollier is today after 18 years of work in the Lockerbie-affair convinced that the decision of the Westminster Justice to keep the document "under national security" closed has the purpose to frustrate the truthfinding about the manipulated MST-13 Timer fragment and to avoid paying compensation:
On the 28th of June 2007 the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) announced at its press conference and probably also in its 800 pages report – which was not public but later on parts of it leaked to the Herald – that a miscarriage of justice may have occured in the conviction against Megrahi and identified 6 grounds that doubted his conviction. The summary of the report (only 14 pages) released to the press named only 4 of the grounds. On the third of October 2007 "The Herald" published all 6 grounds: Ground 5 concerns the secret document "under national security" about the MST-13 timer; ground 6 the alleged remuneration of up to US$2 million to witness Tony Gauci (owner Mary House in Malta)by an US Intelligence Agency.
At the first hearing on the 19th of October 2007 the Appeal Court in Edinburgh suddenly confirms after more than 3 months the existence of a document „under national security"; but keeps ist content closed.
On the 20th of February 2008 the Federal Advocate Lord Davidson, QC, - Westminsters representative in Scottish matters – announced that the secret document "under national security" of an unnamed state was delivered to the British justice already in 1996. The content of the secred document is about the MST-13 timer fragment which allegedly detonated the bomb.
Which strategy is followed by the SCCRC in relation to the new appeal of Megrahi?
1.> The original tactics of the SCCRC were to justify the release of Megrahi with the four "unimportant" grounds (Megrahi and Malta) as mentionned in the summary of the report and maybe with the 6th ground.
Thus Megrahi would get back his long overdue freedom but the state of Libya would still remain "linked" with the attack on PanAm-103 through the MST-13 timer fragment. As a result all compensation claims und the refunding of US$ 2.1 billion would probably be an impossible task.
2.> The fact that the content of the document was kept secret since the 28th of June 2007 indicates that the document „under national security" should remain suppressed for Megrahi's defence team and the state of Libya ... or that the document was "fabricated" or suddenly discoverd for the purpose to have more judicial possibilities in concern to the MST-13 timer because of the secret status of the document.
MEBO's response to the Scottish machinations
Through MEBO's pressure Ex-MEBO Engineer Ulrich Lumpert signed on the 18th of July 2007 an affidavit. In this document he admits the theft and the unlawful handing over of a MST-13 timer board to an investigation officer (22th of June 1989).
Later on the MST-13 timer board was used by an official agency for the fabrication of the manipulated fragment with the Police no. PT-35.
On the 5th of November 2007 Lumpert's affidavit was also confirmed by the Canton of Zurich by an official apostille.
Additionally to the affidavit of Lumpert witness Edwin Bollier applied on the 22th of August 2007 for international legal assistance at the office 1 of the public prosecutor in the Canton of Zurich in favour of Switzerland against Scotland.
In an letter from the 8th of October 2007 to the High Court in Edinburgh Bollier and Lumpert recommend themselves as witnesses in Megrahi's new appeal. It is obvious that these concentrated and well-aimed actions of MEBO put much pressure on the Scottish justice in Edinburgh.
The result:
To prevent international legal assistance from Switzerland and the potential disgrace for the Scottish justice system and to divert at the same time from the explosive affidavit of Lumpert, the newspaper „The Herald" communicated on the third of October 2007 that behind ground 5 of the SCCRC-report a top secret classified document "under national security" was hidden and that its content is about the MST-13 timer. This after the editor of the Herald was feeded with information from the secret and unpublished 800 pages report of the commission's findings.
At the first hearing on the 19th of October 2007 the Appeal court in Edinburgh suddenly confirmed after more than 3 months the existence of a document "under national security"; but keeps ist content closed.
Procecuting counsel Ronnie Clancy added that the secret document did not originate from the USA or one of ist agencies as the CIA.
***
This important document the British justice was in possession of since 1996 was kept away from the judges at Camp Zeist, the judges at the first appeal and Megrahi's defence team.
Immediately after the existence of this secret document was confirmed (19th of October 2007) Megrahi's defence demanded the opening of the document but the appeal court in Edinburgh refused and pleaded for adjournment. The next hearing date was set on the 19th/20th of December 2007.
On the 19th of December 2007 the Appeal Court pleaded for an other adjournment of 8 weeks to decide whether to open or not the document „under national security".
There is probably a reason for the delay of the Scottish justice to annnounce its decision not before the 20th of February 2008.
Because for unknown reasons the judgement in the UTA-772 case didn't take place end of year 2007 as announced, the Scottish authourities didn't want to influence with exonerate evidence in favour of Libya the judgement of their colleagues in the States. Meanwhile (on the 15th of January 2008) the impertinent US judgement over 6 billion US$ happened.
Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini QC agreed on the 20th of February 2008 to open the secret document but the UK Government by Advocate General Lord Davidson, QC, - Westminster's representative in Scottish matters - refused so and argued that it was not in the public interest to release the secret document. He claimed higher national interests: "The national security was at stake"!!!
Seemingly the content of the document "under national security" (MST-13 timer) is so high-explosive that the national security of Great Britain is at stake !!!
The Appeal Court in Edinburgh is expected to comment its decision not to open the secret document during the next days. MEBO will analyze its comment carefully.
Link to Dr. Hans Köchler's statement: http://i-p-o.org/Lockerbie-statement-koechler-25Feb08.htm
Edwin & Mahnaz Bollier-Tavakoli
suppression instead of civil and human rights !!!
The Appeal Court in Edinburgh was reported today (20.2.2008) that the Scottish Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini QC had agreed to open the secret text about the electronic MEBO MST-13 timer in the document under "national security" which relieves Libya and its official Mr Megrahi.
But the UK Government by Advocate General Lord Davidson QC, blocked the progress and has argued that it is not in the public interest to release the secret document. He claimed: "The national security was at stake"!!!
MEBO is very confident that the Libyan Official Mr. Abdelbaset al-Megrahi (political hostage) gets soon back his honour and liberty after the Scottish Appeal Court in Edinburgh has revised its decision in the "Lockerbie-Affair".
THE LOCKERBIE CRYPTO CODE
Only one Lord Advocate was informed in the Lockerbie-Case about the document under "national security". There is a connection between the document under "national security" and the ex Lockerbie- and McKie prosecutor Lord Advocate Colin Boyd QC. On October 5th, 2006 Scotland's top law officer has insisted that his sudden resignation had nothing to do with the Shirley McKie and the Lockerbie case...
Following the announcement in April from 10, Downing Street that Colin Boyd QC, Lord Advocate, is to be appointed to the House of Lords, as of today (14th June 2006) Mr Boyd adopts the title:
"The Right Honourable The Lord Boyd Of Duncansby"
Lord Boyd said: "It is a great honour, both personally and professionally, to be appointed to serve in the House of Lords. I look forward to playing an effective role in policy making for the UK, especially in relation to Scottish affairs." Lord Boyd was be formally introduced into the House
Freedom for the political "Lockerbie-victim" no. 271, Mr. Abdelbaset Ali Mohamed al-Megrahi and end to the political slandering of Libya by claiming government involvement in the Lockerbie-tragedy. We, Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier (MEBO LTD.), count on true Scottish facts which completely exclude any involvement of the government of Libya without any doubt. The conviction of Mr. al-Megrahi and the government of Libya must very clearly be considered a politically motivated conspiracy.
Whether the Scottish High Court on the 20th of February 2008 will open or hold disclosed their decision concerning the "MST-13 document under national security" is actually unimportant. Either decision together with the Affidavit will prove to be positive for Mr. al-Megrahi and the state of Libya; -- any decision will clearly underline that the presently valid sentence is incorrect and premeditated.
We should never forget that conspiracies are not theories but crimes.
Already before the beginning of the Scottish court in Kamp van Zeist (2000) at least one offical insider of the Scottish Trial team knew the presence of a document under "national security", which excludes a connection with Libya and the MST-13 timer fragment. Therefore it was clear that the chain of evidence between the PC board MST-13 and the country of Libya was broken...
Scottish Government block on confidential MST-13 document could free Libyan official Mr. Abdelbaset al Megrahi! The Crown asked for more time to discuss issues surrounding the document. Professor Robert Black (Edinburgh University) said: "This is turning into a complete farce. The whole thing is a shambles and shows the weakness of the Lord Advocate. That she should be prepared to abrogate her decision on disclosure and public interest immunity is disgraceful."
See the Introductory video in english (CBS,60 Minutes)
The truth about the Timerfragment MST-13 (PT/35)