|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
-- SCOTS LAW AT ITS BEST! -- OR THE CONTINUATION OF THE |
|||
All the years since Abdul Majid Giaka entered the CIA-Kindergarten-Program- (where he was then obviously being tought to manifacture evidence-stories that would fit into script-activities of the CIA, DI, FBI..) - we were promised airtight testmony by this "supergrass" double-spy, that would unquestionably identify the two Libyan suspects as the true perpetrators behind the entire Lockerbie-tragedy. With a true "Millenium-Spectacle" in legal matters, law-enforcement, mega-security and a witness protection-program far exeeding the one for the most prominent head of state; (two Atlantic trips for Giaka, accompanied by 30 US-Marshals, voice-distorter, milk-glass-screen, and more...), we finally learn from all the Giaka-testmony: his entire testmony amounts to nothing more than "wishful thinking" in a last-ditch effort to not lose the comfortable CIA-protection! The demonstrative CIA-show in the Giaka-matter, as well as i.e. the two "consulting-/observing" US-lawyers sitting with the Camp van Zeist-judges (no one should ever forget that US-, UN- and Scots authorities have often labelled this to be the "trial of the century"), let us wonder who is truly sitting in the trial's driver's seat! Why are the Crown, the prosecution, the defense and the forensic teams in the Lockerbie-case so eager to spend days, weeks, months to argue over mostly hear-say evidence, rather then returning to strictly technical evidence that can be seen, felt, analysed, tested, re-constructed where needed, pinpointed to the place of origin, etc. in order to very possibly one day soon penetrate through the now still thick fog straight to the actual perpetrators??? Alone the clear statements by world-renowned and famous scientists that the centre of explosion could not have orginated from within container AVE 4041PA (as alleged by the prosecution) should force the court at Camp van Zeist to first clear such vital issues beyond any doubt, before proceeding with flimsical evidence depositions! Also the alleged MEBO MST-13 timer-fragment is from a manipulated, non-functioning prototype PC-board that was never delivered to Libya! The deliberate destruction and manipulation in the case of the so prominently publizised MST-13 timer fragments alone should have been prominent reasons enough to have this technical subject throughly adressed by the court! We still contend that the court simply must resort to very independent, world-renowned technical scientists-/ experts to clear all technical evidence beyond a shadow of doubt! |
|||
|
The MEBO Inc.-defence team and Edwin Bollier, VR |